WordPress Brute Force Attack Protection

A 'brute force' login attack is a type of attack against a website to gain access to the site by guessing the username and password, over and over again. WordPress is the most popular CMS and therefore it's a frequent target of this type of attack. The wp-login.php and xmlrpc.php pages are the most common target of brute force attack by POST method. WordPress doesn't have any built-in protection to prevent this, hence the need for a third-party solution.

Starting with version 5.2.3, LiteSpeed Enterprise has a built-in WordPress brute force attack protection system. It will protect shared hosting WordPress environments from large-scale brute force attacks, which have the potential to bring down entire servers.

How Brute Force Protection Works

The WordPress Protection directive is:

WordPressProtect [off|on|drop|deny|throttle|captcha|full_captcha, ] <limit>

Note

In order to use the captcha option, you need to configure the reCAPTCHA protection feature. Please see the reCAPTCHA Protection Guide for instructions.

The action is optional, and defaults to throttle. The limit can be set together with the action, and has a value of (0|1|2-1000)

Hint

Values lower than 2 will be treated as 2, and values higher than 1000 will be treated as 1000

Example:

  • WordPressProtect drop, 10
  • WordPressProtect throttle, 20
  • WordPressProtect captcha, 2
  • WordPressProtect full_captcha

Note

full_captcha is a special mode which will always show CAPTCHA on wp-login.php page, no need to add extra limit value. Set <wpProtectAction>6</wpProtectAction> on the LSWS native configuration file will also take effect.

This directive can be used at server or virtual host level in the Apache configuration or in the .htaccess under a virtual host document root. The login limit value specifies the maximum number of wp-login.php and xmlrpc.php login attempts allowed within 5 minutes before the IP is blocked.

This limit is handled using a quota system that works as follows:

  • The quota starts at the specified limit value.
  • Each POST attempt decreases the quota by 1
  • Once the quota reaches half of the limit, the IP will be throttled, slowing more as the quota drops further.
  • When the quota reaches 0, the desired action (drop, deny, or throttle) is taken.
  • Over the course of 5 minutes without further POST attempts, the quota gradually increases back to the set limit.
  • Restarting LSWS will reset the quota back to the specified limit value.

Examples

Low Limit Example

  • Assume the limit is set to 10.
  • When there are more than 5 attempts within a short period of time, the IP will be throttled.
  • Once the quota reaches 0, the desired action (drop, deny, or throttle) will be taken.
  • Every 30 seconds (5 minutes divided by the limit = 30 seconds), if there are no further POST attempts, the quota will increase by 1.

High Limit Example

  • Assume the limit is set to 300.
  • When there are more than 150 attempts within a short period of time, the IP will be throttled.
  • Once the quota reaches 0, the desired action (drop, deny, or throttle) will be taken.
  • After 1 second (5 minutes divided by the limit = 1 second) without further POST attempts, the quota will increase by 1.

How to Enable LSWS WordPressProtect Feature

As long as LSWS version is 5.2.3 or above, the LSWS WordPressProtect feature is enabled by default and does not need any extra configuration in the LSWS WebAdmin GUI or in Apache configurations. (WordPressProtect is disabled by default in LiteSpeed Web ADC.)

You may wish to override the default settings at the server level, virtual-host level or even the .htaccess level. Before making any changes, it helps to understand the logic that drives WordPressProtect at the different levels.

Changing the settings at the Apache-server-level configuration will override the setting for any Apache-based virtual host, but will have no impact on LSWS-native virtual hosts, which can only be controlled by LSWS-native settings.

Changing the settings at the Apache-virtual-host level configuration will override the server-level configuration as well as the .htaccess- level. This means that the server administrator's virtual host setting will override the end user's setting in .htaccess.

Let's look at some examples for a WHM/cpanel environment:

You may wish to overide the default limit of 10 to another value such as 5. You will need to set it at the server level of the Apache configuration file here /etc/apache2/conf.d/includes/pre_main_global.conf and add the following:

<IfModule Litespeed>
WordPressProtect throttle, 5
</IfModule>
This will set the limit to 5 for all virtual hosts.

You can also disable the feature globally:

<IfModule Litespeed>
WordPressProtect off
</IfModule>

No matter how the server level is set, the end user has the ability to enable or disable it through .htaccess by adding the following:

<IfModule Litespeed>
WordPressProtect throttle, 15
</IfModule>
or
<IfModule Litespeed>
WordPressProtect throttle, 0
</IfModule>

However, the end user's preference does not override the virtual-host-level, if any setting is specified at that level. For example, if the feature is disabled in the virtual-host-level include file, e.g. vi /etc/apache2/conf.d/userdata/std/2_4/$USER/example.com/wordpress.conf, then any directives in .htaccess will be ignored.

<IfModule Litespeed>
WordPressProtect throttle, 0
</IfModule>

To verify the server and virtual host level settings, you may run the following command:

grep -i -r wordpressprotect * /etc/apache2/

The design logic looks like the following:

Server Level VHost Level .htaccess Result
not set not set not set 10
5 not set not set 5
5 not set 20 20
5 10 not set 10
5 10 20 10

Testing

Drop case

This test was conducted with WordPressProtect set to drop 10. We can see the time start to increase at Round 6 and finally get a connection error at Round 10.

    Round:  1
    fail 0.291 status: 200
    Round:  2
    fail 0.256 status: 200
    Round:  3
    fail 0.256 status: 200
    Round:  4
    fail 0.279 status: 200
    Round:  5
    fail 0.249 status: 200
    Round:  6
    fail 1.275 status: 200
    Round:  7
    fail 2.287 status: 200
    Round:  8
    fail 3.267 status: 200
    Round:  9
    fail 4.271 status: 200
    Round:  10
    Erro MSG:  ('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote end closed connection without response',))

Deny Case

This test was conducted with WordPressProtect set to deny 10. We can see the time start to increase at Round 6 and start getting permission deny 403 status code from Round 10.

    Round:  1
    fail 0.292 status: 200
    Round:  2
    fail 0.267 status: 200
    Round:  3
    fail 0.270 status: 200
    Round:  4
    fail 0.253 status: 200
    Round:  5
    fail 0.268 status: 200
    Round:  6
    fail 1.257 status: 200
    Round:  7
    fail 2.276 status: 200
    Round:  8
    fail 3.260 status: 200
    Round:  9
    fail 4.182 status: 200
    Round:  10
    fail 1.010 status: 403
Log:
Brute force detected, deny

Throttle Case

This test was conducted with WordPressProtect set to throttle 10. We can see the time start to increase at Round 6 and start throttling from Round 10.

    Round:  1
    fail 0.289 status: 200
    Round:  2
    fail 0.269 status: 200
    Round:  3
    fail 0.268 status: 200
    Round:  4
    fail 0.243 status: 200
    Round:  5
    fail 0.263 status: 200
    Round:  6
    fail 1.269 status: 200
    Round:  7
    fail 2.266 status: 200
    Round:  8
    fail 3.280 status: 200
    Round:  9
    fail 4.182 status: 200
    Round:  10
    fail 29.249 status: 200
Log:
Brute force detected, throttle

Advanced

Whitelisting

Since LSWS v5.4, you have been able to set Trusted <ip> in .htaccess to bypass the block and reCAPTCHA check.

Use Trusted 1.2.3.4, 5.6.7.8 for IPv4 or Trusted [2001:db8:85a3:8d3:1319:8a2e:370:7348] for IPv6 in Virtual Host document root .htaccess to unblock a blocked IP and make that IP trusted for that vhost.

Troubleshooting

WordPress Protection Block Never Seems to Expire

Normally the WordPress protection block is expected to expire after 10 minutes, but a visitor is receiving constant 403 errors due to WordPress protection. The error log entry is as follows:

    2018-11-06 15:41:30.862784 [NOTICE] [24.96.xxx.xxx] bot detected for vhost [APVH_kevinandamanda.com], reason: WordPressBruteForce, close connection!
    2018-11-06 16:52:10.591124 [INFO] [108.162.237.188:58160] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied
    2018-11-06 16:54:10.851797 [INFO] [108.162.*.*:57936] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied
    2018-11-06 16:56:11.349033 [INFO] [108.162.*.*:57976] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied
    2018-11-06 16:58:11.819620 [INFO] [108.162.*.*:58196] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied
    2018-11-06 17:00:12.607042 [INFO] [108.162.*.*:58606] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied
    2018-11-06 17:02:13.371969 [INFO] [108.162.*.*:56922] Client IP from header: 24.96.xxx.xxx, conn limit: 10000, cur conns: 13, access denied

The visitor has been blocked for a few hours, and the block is removed after restarting LSWS.

The Explanation

WP protection blocking is only removed if the IP stops access attempts for a full 10 minutes. If the visitor constantly hits the server, the blocking won't be lifted. Restarting the web server will remove all IP blocks immediately.

The bot-detection bot detected or WordPressBruteForce only log when a drop action is set. There won't be log entries for the deny and throttle actions. It is designed this way because drop is a more serious action, which blocks further requests from that IP (it's treated as an unwanted botnet) and the log is for robot detection.

2018-11-06 15:41:30.862784 [NOTICE] [24.96.xxx.xxx] bot detected for vhost [APVH_kevinandamanda.com], reason: WordPressBruteForce, close connection!

Bot detection is one-time logging, while deny and throttle are per request. To log those would be excessive.